Skip to main content

The ACC is the Best Conference in College Football, According to Math

After winning the National Title, Dabo Swinney declared the ACC the best conference in College Football. That was coming off of a tremendous bowl season for the Conference, as well as a National Title. But this is also after a regular season in which the Big Ten dominated headlines, and the annual discussion of conferences centers of the SEC. Do the numbers back up Swinney's claim?

I've updated the rankings from my previous post, and the numbers back up his statement.


The ACC, by an incredibly narrow margin (.02 percentage points more than the SEC), had the highest average Pythagorean expectation. That is despite their top team, Clemson (93.15%), being third in Pythagorean expectation behind Alabama (98.61%) and Michigan (97.09%). They also lead the pack if you use an Olympic Average to remove the impact of outliers. The Olympic Average, designed to prevent corrupt judges from rigging Olympic Figure Skating, takes the average of all but the maximum and minimum of a set. And in that, the ACC continues to be the top dog, with an inflated by Alabama SEC behind by .64 percentage points. The Big Ten was a third using both measures (in the table, the Olympic Average of the three Independent teams appears to be higher; but since that's a single team, BYU, it should be ignored for analysis), followed by the Pac-12 and Big 12 among the Power 5. The SEC also managed to have the best worst team, South Carolina (39.81%), which is something to hang your hat on.

An interesting story is told by the standard deviations of teams. The Big Ten won the dubious honor of being the most inconsistent conference, with a standard deviation of 22.82 percentage points. That's due to having both Michigan in the conference... and Rutgers (22.66%), as well the struggling Illinois (35.01%) and (sigh) Purdue (32.76%). The SEC and ACC are close in standard deviation (17.65 and 17.64 percentage points, respectively), with the Big 12 the most consistent. Some of that results from being the smallest Power 5 conference at 10 teams; some also results from having the worst best team (Oklahoma, 77.31%) in the Power 5 so there is no high outlier to bring up the standard deviation. Compared to some of the Group of 5 conferences that have some terrible teams (overall worst Texas State, 7.80%, I'm looking at you) as well as some decent teams, Kansas (32.18%), the second worst Power 5 team, is still better than 24 teams, among them all of the worst team in each Group of 5 conference, and Rutgers (but not Purdue; Boiler Up!).

So ACC, congratulations. You have reached the high peak of college football. You have dethroned the conference of arrogant jerks SEC. The Clemson Tigers have had one amazing season, and as an underdog beat Alabama to earn a National Title. And top to bottom the conference is filled with good teams.

Now, if only September could come again... 8 months is too long of a wait for another season.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2017 Weekly Boiler Stat Summaries: Week 13, v. IU

This is the first time the Bucket has been home since I was a junior at Purdue – the first year of Darrell Hazell’s tenure in West Lafayette. I am not nearly a good enough writer to capture my happiness in this moment. Purdue spent my entire post-college life (and half of college) being a joke nationally with very little to be proud of on Saturday afternoons in the fall. In just one year the narrative has changed. The Boilers won five games against FBS competition (a winning percentage of 11.36%) and three conference games (9.09%) during the 48-game Hazell era; in a single season, Brohm has won six FBS games, including four in conference, for a 50.00% winning percentage overall and 44.44% in conference. And with 6.8 second order wins (wins expected based on per play success rate) per S&P+, one may say that Purdue underachieved in the win column compared to how the Boilers played. Jeff Brohm has done something incredible this year, and capped it off with a win against IU – finally b...

Making a Spreadsheet, Checking It Twice, Gonna Find Out When It's Socially Acceptable to Listen To Christmas Music

It’s that time of year again. And by that time, I mean the time when you aren’t sure if it’s too early to hear Christmas music yet. Is it OK to walk into a certain coffee shop chain in early November and grab a seasonal beverage that can barely call itself coffee? Is it too early to hum a carol when I’ll be waiting to get on a plane the day before Thanksgiving? While driving to your favorite Black Friday activity (the correct answer is skeet shooting or watching football), should the speakers be spreading holiday cheer? Or do you need to wait until you break out the advent calendars to put on a festive record? To answer this age old question, I’m trusting the fine Google searches of my fellow Americans. Using Google Trends data from 2012-2016, I’m going to compare each week of the years’ average searches for the term “Christmas music” as a percentage of the maximum to determine when Americans start listening to Christmas music [1]. Figure 1: Christmas Graph, Oh Christmas Graph ...

This Year's Bowl Season Was As Bad For The Big Ten As It Looked.

After this year's bowl games, the narrative that developed among the sports media was the Big Ten, after what seemed like a historically strong regular season, proved to be weak after a terrible bowl performance. But how bad was that bowl performance? To find out, I compared the actual performance of the conferences to a set of 10,000 simulations of this year's bowl games, excluding this Monday's National Championship Game. To create the simulations, I used log5 and Pythagorean expectations, as I did previously for the NFL and MLB . However, because of the variability in strength of schedule in college football, using actual points scored for the Pythagorean expectations would be inaccurate. Instead, I'm using the Football Outsider's S&P+ ratings of offense and defense  (referenced on 1/4/2017), which adjust for strength of schedule and account for efficiency as well as performance.  To rate the performance of each conference, I found the percentile of t...