Skip to main content

An Explanation of The Numbers-Only Previews

Over the past few days, I've been posting "Numbers-Only Previews" of Purdue's men's and women's NCAA Basketball tournament games. Why a number's only previews? Partially, my own laziness on not wanting to spend all the free time I have writing full articles for each game in both tournaments. Primarily, I know while watching games I'd prefer to have a concise reference of important stats to better inform myself about the teams than a large block of text I have to slog through to get the same information. I also like to just have the numbers, and be able to reach my own conclusions of what they mean, rather than be given someone else's opinion.

The previews contain tables of information. The first is a team table, stating:

  1.  Overall rankings (KenPom for the men, Sagarin for the women) 
  2. The possession adjusted scoring offense and defense (for men, these are the KenPom strength-of-schedule adjusted numbers; for  women, they are the points scored/allowed divided by estimate possessions; these are not strength of schedule adjusted)
  3. Pythagorean expectation derived from the scoring offense and defense
  4. Purdue's win probability (log5 from Pythagorean expectation for the men; for the women, both the log5 AND a win probability from FiveThirtyEight's composite power rankings are used. This is to give a strength of schedule adjusted probability to compare to)
  5. Each team's combined shooting statistics: 2 field goal point shooting percentage, 3 field goal point shooting percentage, effective field goal percentage, and free throw percentage.
  6. Each team's allowed shooting statistics (the same set of stats as above)
The second table is the matchups table. This was missing for the first women's game; due to the lack of accessible advanced stats for women's basketball, measures like box plus-minus or win-shares are not available. Upcoming, I will add in Dean Oliver's offensive and defensive ratings for the upcoming came Sunday v. Notre Dame. The matchups table includes:
  1. The players name, number, height and position, with players ordered by position and minutes per game.
  2. Player's minutes per game (calculated by dividing total minutes by a team's total games).
  3. Offensive, defensive, and total box plus-minus for men (from sports-reference). For women, offensive and defensive ratings will be used starting with Purdue v. Notre Dame on Sunday March 19th. 
The third table is the shooting table, comparing the shooting stats for each player. Included are:

  1. The players name, number, height and position, with players ordered by position and minutes per game.
  2. Player's minutes per game (calculated by dividing total minutes by a team's total games).
  3. Each player's combined shooting statistics: 2 field goal point shooting percentage, 3 field goal point shooting percentage, effective field goal percentage, and free throw percentage.
Boiler Up!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brohm and Calhoun: Purdue's New Top Two Choices Analyzed

Earlier in the silly season  coaching search, the top two coaching candidates floated by Purdue's fan base were Western Michigan's P.J. Fleck and former LSU head coach Les Miles. In recent days, it has appeared neither may end up in West Lafayette. Yesterday, news-ish broke-ish that a deal was done-ish with Purdue and current Western Kentucky head coach Jeff Brohm.  Western Kentucky was revealed to be beginning its own coach search, while coach without an agent Jeff Brohm stated no deal existed and he would not think about future plans until after the C-USA championship game today. Another name floated was current Air Force Academy head coach Troy Calhoun. Which are two odd choices when considered together; at Air Force Calhoun ran a run-heavy option offense (although he has experience coaching quarterbacks in the NFL under Gary Kubiak) and Brohm's offense at WKU was a pass-oriented spread offense. Using the same methods I used to look at Purdue's last few coaches , I...
2 comments
Read more

Disney Princesses Are Not All, In Fact, Princesses

This past weekend, I went to see Disney's new (and very good) animated film Moana . There was a (genre aware) exchange between the title character and the demigod Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson  Maui regarding whether or not the title character was a princess. Maui's evidence is as follows: she  a) is "daughter of a chief," b) "wears a dress," and c) has  "an animal sidekick." Of course, the definition of princess is typically understood as a woman who fit one of the two descriptions: is daughter of a monarch, or the wife or widow of a prince (in turn defined as the son of a monarch, a monarch in his own right, or the wife of a princess). Disney markets 11 individuals as "Disney Princesses": Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, Jasmine, Pocahontas, Mulan, Tiana, Rapunzel and Merida. They also market the two female protogonists (and daughters of monarchs) of Frozen, Anna and Elsa (who is in fact a monarch), in a similar man...
1 comment
Read more

NASL Power Rankings, Games Through 5/5/2017

Definitions: Pythagorean Expectation, Preseason = The previous year's Real Pythagorean Expectation, with a factor of regression to the mean based on the year-to-year correlation of  Real Pythagorean Expectation. Pythagorean Expectation, Real =  Pythagorean expectation of points , based upon goals scored and goals allowed so far this season. An exponent of 1.27, derived from analysis of previous NASL seasons, is used Pythagorean Expectation, Bayesian = The main power ranking. Using Bayes' Theorem, updates its value accounting for new information. Begins with the preseason ranking, then updates week to week after that.  Expected Final Points = Using the Bayesian Pythagorean Expectation, the number of points a team has already, and the possible points remaining, is found Why am I doing a power ranking for a Division II soccer league? Because it is the league Indy has a team in.
Post a Comment
Read more