Losing Haas Would Be A Big Loss

Isaac Haas, after fracturing his elbow in a first round win over Cal State Fullerton, could miss the remainder of the NCAA tournament (although practiced today with a brace, so all hope is not lost). Haas’s dominance in the paint has been a critical part of the Boilermaker offense all season, so missing him could be devastating for the Boiler’s chances of reaching a Final Four. But how devastating [1]?

Per sports-reference, Haas’s Box Plus Mins (i.e., contribution over an average player to points over 100 possessions) is 3.9 on offense, 2.8 on defense, and 6.6 overall (sports-reference’s rounding at one decimal place produces an error that means defensive and offensive numbers do not add to exactly the overall). Combining that with KenPom’s team efficiencies per 100 possessions, one can estimate what the impact of Haas’s contributions being lost would mean. The loss of Haas would dramatically impact the Boilermaker team, dropping the team from a +26.90 rating on KenPom (i.e. expected points margin over a “average” team) to a +20.30 margin, with a drop from 5^th in the nation to 18^th in the nation (between Auburn and Houston) [2,3].

Figure 1: Impact of Losing Isaac Haas on Purdue’s Team Statistics [2,3]

In comparison to the rest of the teams remaining in the East Region of this year’s tournament, how big of a setback is that? Quite a large one, actually. With Haas, Purdue is a favorite over all remaining teams in the region except Villanova, against whom Purdue would be a 4.8 point underdog. And the closest non-Villanova team would be West Virginia, with the Mountaineers a 4.64 point underdog. Without Haas, Purdue is only favored against their second round opponent, Butler, by 1.67 points, as well as possibly later opponents Florida by 1.17 points and Marshall by 13.45 points. Villanova would become a 11.4 point favorite [2,3,4].

Figure 2: Impact of Losing Haas on Possible Regional Opponents [2,3,4]

If Haas, even at a 50% level, could return, Purdue would be favored against all opponents save Villanova. The pre-tournament expectation of most fans, an Elite Eight appearance, would still be in reach, although an elusive Final Four will still be a long shot, with having “half-a-Haas” (i.e., a 3.4 point margin improvement) meaning the Wildcats would be an 8 point favorite. But on the bright side, Purdue won't be screwed by a torn ACL this time

Boiler Up!

References

[1] https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/isaac-haas-injury-update-purdue-center-practices-with-brace-after-being-ruled-out/

[2] https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/isaac-haas-1.html

[3] https://kenpom.com/

[4] https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-march-madness-predictions/?ex_cid=rrpromo

Comments

Making a Spreadsheet, Checking It Twice, Gonna Find Out When It's Socially Acceptable to Listen To Christmas Music

It’s that time of year again. And by that time, I mean the time when you aren’t sure if it’s too early to hear Christmas music yet. Is it OK to walk into a certain coffee shop chain in early November and grab a seasonal beverage that can barely call itself coffee? Is it too early to hum a carol when I’ll be waiting to get on a plane the day before Thanksgiving? While driving to your favorite Black Friday activity (the correct answer is skeet shooting or watching football), should the speakers be spreading holiday cheer? Or do you need to wait until you break out the advent calendars to put on a festive record? To answer this age old question, I’m trusting the fine Google searches of my fellow Americans. Using Google Trends data from 2012-2016, I’m going to compare each week of the years’ average searches for the term “Christmas music” as a percentage of the maximum to determine when Americans start listening to Christmas music [1]. Figure 1: Christmas Graph, Oh Christmas Graph ...

This Year's Bowl Season Was As Bad For The Big Ten As It Looked.

After this year's bowl games, the narrative that developed among the sports media was the Big Ten, after what seemed like a historically strong regular season, proved to be weak after a terrible bowl performance. But how bad was that bowl performance? To find out, I compared the actual performance of the conferences to a set of 10,000 simulations of this year's bowl games, excluding this Monday's National Championship Game. To create the simulations, I used log5 and Pythagorean expectations, as I did previously for the NFL and MLB . However, because of the variability in strength of schedule in college football, using actual points scored for the Pythagorean expectations would be inaccurate. Instead, I'm using the Football Outsider's S&P+ ratings of offense and defense (referenced on 1/4/2017), which adjust for strength of schedule and account for efficiency as well as performance. To rate the performance of each conference, I found the percentile of t...

2018 Weekly Boiler Stat Summaries: Week 8, v. an Ohio State University

I could say something emotional about the win, OR I could hope we all have our own memories that may or may not include a realization of how low our TV room ceilings are. a Bad Defense and The Great Offense Going into Saturday's game , I was pretty confident the Boilers - a pretty darn solid offense - would have success scoring against a struggling Buckeye defense. That is exactly what happened. These are numbers that should be left to stand on their own because HOLY MACKEREL PURDUE DID THAT TO OHIO STATE. Figure 1: Purdue Individual Rushing Statistics [1,2] Figure 2: Purdue Individual Passing Statistics [1,2] Only thing to note is that Purdue's rushing came mainly from some explosive runs from Knox rather than a consistent set of runs from all the backs. This isn't exactly what you want to see for success through a season (and a sign run blocking may need a bit of work), but you have to give D.J. some credit here. an Inability to Score The Buckeyes, at le...

Speak With Data

Search This Blog