Skip to main content

Are You Getting Excited/Scared Because of NFL Preseason Performance? Don’t.

This weekend, the NFL preseason kicks off in Canton with the Colts and Packers. Also, the Olympics, International Champions Cup, and the Indiana State Fair are happening. So, it’s a busy time in sports and artery destruction. So definitely it’s going to be entertaining, and maybe it will impact your health in 20 years (I can dig some football, futbol, sports only on TV every four years, and random fried things). But, as you see your favorite NFL team founder, excel, or be somewhere in the middle over the next month, how much should you draw from that in terms of the next few months of your life?

Some may say very little because it’s 4 (or 5, for the Hall of Fame Game teams) games, mostly featuring back ups. And of course, the 2008 Detroit Lions managed to win every preseason game and lose every regular season game. But that is hardly a deep empirical analysis. Of course, with the limited sample size, a strict, actual winning percentage is a bad measure of team performance. Winning half your preseason games and winning 3 out of 4 is a rather similar performance, much more similar than regular season records with the same winning percentages, 8-8 and 12-4.

So, how can the performances of a team in the preseason and regular season? One tool, originating in baseball and adapted to football by Football Outsiders, is the Pythagorean expectation, which uses the points scored by and against a team to predict the record (in this case, I’m using winning percentage because they can be comparable independent of number of games played) of a team. Since there is a greater variation in those values between teams in preseason, it should allow a more realistic range of potential results. And, because the values are also very easily able to be calculated for both the preseason and regular season, it should allow a large number of data points to be compared. For football, the equation is as follows:
Pythagorean Expectation=((Points for)^2.37)/((Points for)^2.37+(Points against)^2.37)  
So, how does the preseason stack up as a predictor? Using the NFL’s data from the 2006-2015 seasons, this comparison can be easily performed (well, aside from a lot of copying and pasting from NFL.com). Not particularly well, actually. Well there is a slight correlation (a Pearson coefficient of .261), but as can be seen below, it is much more of noise than a pattern.

There are a mix of teams that excelled in the preseason and tanked in the regular season (2008 Lions), did poorly in the preseason and well in the regular season (2011 San Francisco 49er’s), and did roughly the same in both (2013 Seattle Seahawks).

So if your favorite team is doing very poorly or very well, it means nothing, right? Not exactly. There is a significant (Pearson of -.684) between a team’s preseason Pythagorean expectation and the difference between the preseason and regular season record. As shown in the graph below, this effectively means that teams that do either very well or very poorly in the preseason are likely to not be as big of a success or failure in the regular season.


Teams, on average, trend to being pretty average. So if your favorite team absolutely faceplants during the preseason, don’t be alarmed. They will probably not be terrible, just most likely mediocre. And potentially a playoff team. Which is better than the alternative. Sorry Lions’ fans.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brohm and Calhoun: Purdue's New Top Two Choices Analyzed

Earlier in the silly season  coaching search, the top two coaching candidates floated by Purdue's fan base were Western Michigan's P.J. Fleck and former LSU head coach Les Miles. In recent days, it has appeared neither may end up in West Lafayette. Yesterday, news-ish broke-ish that a deal was done-ish with Purdue and current Western Kentucky head coach Jeff Brohm.  Western Kentucky was revealed to be beginning its own coach search, while coach without an agent Jeff Brohm stated no deal existed and he would not think about future plans until after the C-USA championship game today. Another name floated was current Air Force Academy head coach Troy Calhoun. Which are two odd choices when considered together; at Air Force Calhoun ran a run-heavy option offense (although he has experience coaching quarterbacks in the NFL under Gary Kubiak) and Brohm's offense at WKU was a pass-oriented spread offense. Using the same methods I used to look at Purdue's last few coaches , I
2 comments
Read more

Disney Princesses Are Not All, In Fact, Princesses

This past weekend, I went to see Disney's new (and very good) animated film Moana . There was a (genre aware) exchange between the title character and the demigod Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson  Maui regarding whether or not the title character was a princess. Maui's evidence is as follows: she  a) is "daughter of a chief," b) "wears a dress," and c) has  "an animal sidekick." Of course, the definition of princess is typically understood as a woman who fit one of the two descriptions: is daughter of a monarch, or the wife or widow of a prince (in turn defined as the son of a monarch, a monarch in his own right, or the wife of a princess). Disney markets 11 individuals as "Disney Princesses": Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, Jasmine, Pocahontas, Mulan, Tiana, Rapunzel and Merida. They also market the two female protogonists (and daughters of monarchs) of Frozen, Anna and Elsa (who is in fact a monarch), in a similar man
1 comment
Read more

NASL Power Rankings, Games Through 5/5/2017

Definitions: Pythagorean Expectation, Preseason = The previous year's Real Pythagorean Expectation, with a factor of regression to the mean based on the year-to-year correlation of  Real Pythagorean Expectation. Pythagorean Expectation, Real =  Pythagorean expectation of points , based upon goals scored and goals allowed so far this season. An exponent of 1.27, derived from analysis of previous NASL seasons, is used Pythagorean Expectation, Bayesian = The main power ranking. Using Bayes' Theorem, updates its value accounting for new information. Begins with the preseason ranking, then updates week to week after that.  Expected Final Points = Using the Bayesian Pythagorean Expectation, the number of points a team has already, and the possible points remaining, is found Why am I doing a power ranking for a Division II soccer league? Because it is the league Indy has a team in.
Post a Comment
Read more