Skip to main content

Grid O' Sadness: Update and Methodology

Earlier this week (prior to the start of the World Series) I posted the Grid O' Sadness, showing the relative odds of the Cubs, Bears, Indians, and Browns winning the most of their remaining games. Since then, the Indians have won two games, the Cubs one, and my promise to explain my methodology struggled to happen. Since Purdue is currently struggling against Penn State, I decided to get my mind off those struggles by explaining the methodology.

First though, an update to the Grid O' Sadness (again, I apologize):

So, that's looking up for the Indians.

The model I created to simulate the remainder of the season is based on two statistical tools: the Pythagorean expectation (1), which I used in my discussion of the NFL preseason, and log5 (2). Both were developed by Bill James to analyze teams in baseball. The Pythagorean expectation uses the points (I'm saying points instead of runs to use the same term across multiple sports) scored and points allowed by a team to create an expectation of the winning percentage of a team. This tends to be more accurate at rating teams than the real winning percentage. For the MLB teams, I used their regular season statistics (3); since on average the average MLB team is average, it gives a more equivalent comparison than including postseason statistics that are dependent on the teams faced in the postseason (which vary in ability significantly) For the NFL teams, I used their statistics (4) so far on a per-game basis (since NFL teams have played differing numbers of game); since we are about halfway through the season, the average team they have faced can be assumed to be average.

Ok, having rated the two World Series teams and the entire NFL (I am pretty meh to say my Washington Redskins are at 16th), I can use those the Pythagorean expectations to calculate game odds using Log5, which takes the winning percentage of two teams to create the probability a team will win. Using the probabilities, the World Series and remaining NFL schedules (5, 6) of the teams of Cleveland and Chicago can be simulated (100000 times), producing win totals (and the probabilities of them) and the resulting Grid O' Sadness. 

Also, since as a result I had to produce rankings for the entire NFL (as of Wednesday), those are added to this post as well. Chicago, you can take away your Bears aren't the worst team in the NFL. Both the 49er and Browns are worse teams than you. For Cleveland fans... well, at least you had the NBA title and maybe the World Series. And maybe your college football team of choice can not continuously turnover the ball. Boilers.

Citations
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_expectation
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log5
(3) http://www.espn.com/mlb/standings/_/group/league
(4) http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total; http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total/position/defense
(5) http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/schedule-and-events/schedule.html
(6) http://www.chicagobears.com/gameday/schedule.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brohm and Calhoun: Purdue's New Top Two Choices Analyzed

Earlier in the silly season  coaching search, the top two coaching candidates floated by Purdue's fan base were Western Michigan's P.J. Fleck and former LSU head coach Les Miles. In recent days, it has appeared neither may end up in West Lafayette. Yesterday, news-ish broke-ish that a deal was done-ish with Purdue and current Western Kentucky head coach Jeff Brohm.  Western Kentucky was revealed to be beginning its own coach search, while coach without an agent Jeff Brohm stated no deal existed and he would not think about future plans until after the C-USA championship game today. Another name floated was current Air Force Academy head coach Troy Calhoun. Which are two odd choices when considered together; at Air Force Calhoun ran a run-heavy option offense (although he has experience coaching quarterbacks in the NFL under Gary Kubiak) and Brohm's offense at WKU was a pass-oriented spread offense. Using the same methods I used to look at Purdue's last few coaches , I

Disney Princesses Are Not All, In Fact, Princesses

This past weekend, I went to see Disney's new (and very good) animated film Moana . There was a (genre aware) exchange between the title character and the demigod Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson  Maui regarding whether or not the title character was a princess. Maui's evidence is as follows: she  a) is "daughter of a chief," b) "wears a dress," and c) has  "an animal sidekick." Of course, the definition of princess is typically understood as a woman who fit one of the two descriptions: is daughter of a monarch, or the wife or widow of a prince (in turn defined as the son of a monarch, a monarch in his own right, or the wife of a princess). Disney markets 11 individuals as "Disney Princesses": Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, Jasmine, Pocahontas, Mulan, Tiana, Rapunzel and Merida. They also market the two female protogonists (and daughters of monarchs) of Frozen, Anna and Elsa (who is in fact a monarch), in a similar man

NASL Power Rankings, Games Through 5/5/2017

Definitions: Pythagorean Expectation, Preseason = The previous year's Real Pythagorean Expectation, with a factor of regression to the mean based on the year-to-year correlation of  Real Pythagorean Expectation. Pythagorean Expectation, Real =  Pythagorean expectation of points , based upon goals scored and goals allowed so far this season. An exponent of 1.27, derived from analysis of previous NASL seasons, is used Pythagorean Expectation, Bayesian = The main power ranking. Using Bayes' Theorem, updates its value accounting for new information. Begins with the preseason ranking, then updates week to week after that.  Expected Final Points = Using the Bayesian Pythagorean Expectation, the number of points a team has already, and the possible points remaining, is found Why am I doing a power ranking for a Division II soccer league? Because it is the league Indy has a team in.