Skip to main content

2018 Weekly Boiler Stat Summaries: Week 5, v. Nebraska

Nebraska has been quite bad in Scott Frost's first season. We beat them handily, which continues the level of play the Boilers have put together in the past couple weeks. That is, of course, great. However, looking at the stats, there are a few worrying issues that present themselves, despite the very positive 42-28 score line.

The Good, the Bad, and the Frustrating of the Passing Game

Once again, Brohm leaned on the arm of David Blough to deliver a victory, with 54.43% of plays passes (FBS average: 47.02%). Blough continued to deliver. In both yards per dropback (7.81) and yards per completion (13.12), Blough exceeded the FBS average (6.72 yards/dropback and 12.43 yards/completion). He definitely has his offensive line to thank: the Huskers recorded a single sack on 43 dropbacks, for a sack rate of 2.33%. Nebraska's 7.69% sack rate on the season is above average (6.57%), and they were unable to get any pressure on Blough [1,2,3].

Figure 1: Purdue Individual Passing Statistics [1,2,3]
On the flip side, the Boilermaker receiving corps were a bit of a mixed bag. In general, Purdue's catch rate of 65.79% well exceeded the FBS average of 58.12%, with the wide receivers a bit closer to average, with 59.26%. However, there was wild variation among the receivers [1,4]:

Figure 2: Purdue Individual Receiving Statistics [1,2]
Rondale Moore, who was most targeted, continued to be stellar, along with the running backs and tight ends. However, the two outside receivers absolutely struggled, with both Isaac Zico and Jared Sparks having catch rates below 50%. The numbers speak for themselves, but what is more annoying (at least subjectively) is that a number of those drops or passes defended were in prime position to score, including a couple times balls passed through receivers hands. With a young receiving corp, this isn't too shocking, but is definitely a place for the coaching staff to focus for practice during the bye week [1]. 

An Average Day On The Ground

On the season, the Boiler's 22nd ranked rushing offense (6.03 yards/rush; FBS average: 5.15) has been a major mover of the ball down the field. On Saturday, it was just average, netting 5.28 yards/rush (on the year, that would rank 54th in FBS, a spot currently occupied by Utah). It is pretty close to what the Huskers have allowed on the season, at 5.27 yards/rush allowed. Some of this comes down to Brohm choosing to pass in most situations, mainly running in game states where it is obvious. With the passing game flourishing, that is an OK strategy, although given the talent we have at the running back position (see the gaudy numbers put up in the first few weeks of the season), greater use of the rushing game may make sense in more situations in the game [1,2,3].

Figure 3: Purdue Individual Rushing Statistics [1,2]

Thank Goodness for Field Position

The Huskers, despite losing, were still able to move the ball relatively well, putting up similar numbers to the Boilers in the passing game and rather impressive numbers while rushing:

Figure 4: Nebraska Individual Passing Statistics [1,2]
Figure 5: Nebraska Individual Rushing Statistics [1,2]
That is a rushing average that would rank second in FBS if averaged over the year. Because Purdue was able to pull ahead early enough, the Huskers weren't able to fully utilize the rushing attack, throwing on 55.00% of plays. Purdue did an excellent job on third down, allowing the Huskers to gain first downs on only 33.33% of third downs. This set up pretty great field position for the Boilers, which played into their success greatly [1,2,5]: 

Figure 6: Drive Statistics [1]

B-word Update

Figure 7: Purdue Win Distribution [6]
Starting 0-3 absolutely did not help the odds of returning to the post season. It doesn't sink it totally, but definitely makes the fact Southwest flies non-stop to more places than just hubs great for the visiting family you will probably see without a trip to the post season. A large amount of this comes from the fact, aside from at Illinois after the bye, Purdue is not favored in a single game and faces three opponents in the top 25 in S&P+ and their worst opponent at 55th (Minnesota, in Minneapolis). And while the Boilers may have been stout against the run against BC, a performance like this past weekend's is not going to be enough to upset the likes of Wisconsin or Iowa. Unless the run defense can prove to be consistent, picking up four more wins in the Big Ten West will be difficult [6].
Don't Go To Where Else

Coming up this weekend is the bye week, with a chance for some of the issues with the team to be fixed in practice, and for players to get a chance to rest, and hopefully not get arrested at Where Else. Likely coming up over this week is some non-Purdue content from this blog, in addition to a preview of the 13 October game at Illinois. 

Figure 8: Purdue Team Statistics [3,6]

Boiler Up!

References
[1] http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=401013338
[2] https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/boxscores/2018-09-29-nebraska.html
[3] https://stats.ncaa.org/rankings/change_sport_year_div
[4] http://ncaasavant.com/targets.php
[5] http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401013338
[6] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ2e9xV7-ClihFVJ3kla0ZDxzFCQ7-WXvQRur-nK6gOzo333PqSetw52kEGgbXKb6viGZSbYuJugvRR/pubhtml#

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2017 Weekly Boiler Stat Summaries: Week 13, v. IU

This is the first time the Bucket has been home since I was a junior at Purdue – the first year of Darrell Hazell’s tenure in West Lafayette. I am not nearly a good enough writer to capture my happiness in this moment. Purdue spent my entire post-college life (and half of college) being a joke nationally with very little to be proud of on Saturday afternoons in the fall. In just one year the narrative has changed. The Boilers won five games against FBS competition (a winning percentage of 11.36%) and three conference games (9.09%) during the 48-game Hazell era; in a single season, Brohm has won six FBS games, including four in conference, for a 50.00% winning percentage overall and 44.44% in conference. And with 6.8 second order wins (wins expected based on per play success rate) per S&P+, one may say that Purdue underachieved in the win column compared to how the Boilers played. Jeff Brohm has done something incredible this year, and capped it off with a win against IU – finally b...

Making a Spreadsheet, Checking It Twice, Gonna Find Out When It's Socially Acceptable to Listen To Christmas Music

It’s that time of year again. And by that time, I mean the time when you aren’t sure if it’s too early to hear Christmas music yet. Is it OK to walk into a certain coffee shop chain in early November and grab a seasonal beverage that can barely call itself coffee? Is it too early to hum a carol when I’ll be waiting to get on a plane the day before Thanksgiving? While driving to your favorite Black Friday activity (the correct answer is skeet shooting or watching football), should the speakers be spreading holiday cheer? Or do you need to wait until you break out the advent calendars to put on a festive record? To answer this age old question, I’m trusting the fine Google searches of my fellow Americans. Using Google Trends data from 2012-2016, I’m going to compare each week of the years’ average searches for the term “Christmas music” as a percentage of the maximum to determine when Americans start listening to Christmas music [1]. Figure 1: Christmas Graph, Oh Christmas Graph ...

This Year's Bowl Season Was As Bad For The Big Ten As It Looked.

After this year's bowl games, the narrative that developed among the sports media was the Big Ten, after what seemed like a historically strong regular season, proved to be weak after a terrible bowl performance. But how bad was that bowl performance? To find out, I compared the actual performance of the conferences to a set of 10,000 simulations of this year's bowl games, excluding this Monday's National Championship Game. To create the simulations, I used log5 and Pythagorean expectations, as I did previously for the NFL and MLB . However, because of the variability in strength of schedule in college football, using actual points scored for the Pythagorean expectations would be inaccurate. Instead, I'm using the Football Outsider's S&P+ ratings of offense and defense  (referenced on 1/4/2017), which adjust for strength of schedule and account for efficiency as well as performance.  To rate the performance of each conference, I found the percentile of t...